STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING WRITING SKILLS TO ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Keywords:
Second language writing, ELL, genre pedagogy, process writingAbstract
Teaching writing to English language learners (ELLs) requires more than assigning topics and correcting errors. Writing is a socially situated, cognitively demanding activity in which learners must generate ideas, organize meaning for a reader, and select linguistic resources that fit a purpose and genre. This thesis synthesizes research-based approaches to ELL writing instruction and proposes an integrated classroom framework that combines genre awareness, process-oriented composing, strategic self-regulation, and feedback cycles. A structured narrative review of major scholarship and classroom studies indicates that learners improve most when instruction is explicit, scaffolded, and sustained across drafting and revision, rather than limited to product evaluation. Findings highlight the value of mentor texts and genre pedagogy, guided planning and revision routines, strategy instruction (including self-regulated strategy development), and feedback designs that promote uptake through peer review training and focused written corrective feedback. The paper concludes that effective ELL writing instruction is achieved when teachers align tasks with authentic communicative goals, make expectations visible, and cultivate learners’ autonomy through manageable strategies and iterative practice.
Downloads
References
Hyland K. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Hyland K. Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2007. Vol. 16, Issue 3. P. 148–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005.
Graham S., Perin D. Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education, 2007.
Ferris D.R. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
Bitchener J., Ferris D.R. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. New York: Routledge, 2012.
Truscott J. The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes // Language Learning. 1996. Vol. 46, No. 2. P. 327–369. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x.
Lundstrom K., Baker W. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2009. Vol. 18, Issue 1. P. 30–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.
Min H.-T. The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2006. Vol. 15, Issue 2. P. 118–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003.
Teng L.S., Zhang L.J. Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? // Journal of Second Language Writing. 2020. Vol. 48. Art. 100701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Baymakova Sarvinoz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content published on the International Scientific and Current Research Conferences platform, including conference papers, abstracts, and presentations, is made available under an open-access model. Users are free to access, share, and distribute this content, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors and the source.
