THE AGGRIEVED WHITE MALE PHENOMENON: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL STABILITY
Abstract
Introduction: The aggrieved white male phenomenon has emerged as a significant social and political issue in Western democracies, marked by a growing sense of victimhood and frustration within this demographic. This phenomenon is largely fueled by perceptions of economic displacement, social marginalization, and cultural shift, which are compounded by political narratives that exacerbate these feelings. While the grievances of this group are complex and multifaceted, their consequences for democracy, social peace, and political stability are increasingly alarming.
Methods: This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative data to investigate the causes and implications of the aggrieved white male phenomenon. It draws upon existing ethnographic research, interviews with individuals from aggrieved white male communities, and media analysis of online forums and political discourse. Additionally, survey data measuring political attitudes, economic anxieties, and perceptions of social change are analyzed to better understand the demographic's worldview and political behavior. Case studies from the United States and Europe are used to contextualize the findings.
Results: The study finds that feelings of economic and social marginalization among white men are significant drivers of their grievances. These individuals often perceive themselves as losing their traditional socio-economic and cultural privileges in the face of globalization, immigration, and progressive social movements. Furthermore, the research reveals that these grievances are closely linked to rising support for right-wing populism and political extremism. Psychologically, the sense of status loss fuels radicalization, with online communities playing a major role in reinforcing these feelings and directing them toward violent ideologies.
Discussion: The aggrieved white male phenomenon poses a direct threat to democratic stability and peace. The study suggests that the political radicalization of this group is not solely a result of economic factors but is also influenced by social and psychological dynamics, including identity anxiety and perceived existential threats. The growth of far-right ideologies and violent extremism among this group challenges the fundamental principles of liberal democracy and social cohesion. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach, including economic reforms, political inclusivity, and psychological interventions to prevent further radicalization and promote national unity.
Conclusion: This research underscores the urgent need for policymakers to address the grievances of aggrieved white men in ways that prevent further division and extremism. Solutions should involve both immediate measures to alleviate economic insecurity and long-term strategies to foster inclusive political and social participation. Only by understanding the deep-rooted causes of these grievances can democratic societies mitigate the risks posed by political polarization and preserve social peace.
Keywords
Aggrieved white male, white male identity, social stabilityHow to Cite
References
Ahmad, Menal. 2023. You don’t want to be PERCEIVED as Wild and Unruly: How Ethnic Minority Women experience and Negotiate their Autonomy within Honor-Related Contexts. Social Sciences 12: 575.
Ahmed, Akbar. 2003. Islam Under Siege. New York: Polity.
Amaral, Oswaldo. 2020. The Victory of Jair Bolsonaro According to the Brazilian Electoral Study of 2018. Brazilian Political Science Review 14: e0004.
Ambedkar, Bhimrao Ramji. 2014. The Essential Writings. Edited by Valerian Rodrigues. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ashokkumar, Ashwini, and William B. Swann. 2022. Restoring Honor by Slapping or Disowning the Daughter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 49: 823–36.
Bastos, Marco, and Raquel Recuero. 2023. The Insurrectionist Playbook: Jair Bolsonaro and the National Congress of Brazil. Social Media + Society 9.
Bhaskar, Roy. 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2018. Racism Without Racists. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bosson, Jennifer K., Joseph A. Vandello, and Camille E. Buckner. 2021. The Psychology of Sex and Gender, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Boucher, Geoff. 2024. Is Trump a Fascist? No- he’s a new brand of authoritarian. The Conversation. Available online: https://theconversation.com/is-donald-trump-a-fascist-no-hes-a-new-brand-of-authoritarian-241586 (accessed on 28 October 2024).
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brooks, David. 2024. How Ivy League Broke America. The Atlantic 334: 26–40.
Brubaker, Rogers. 2006. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chakrabarti, Poulomi. 2020. The Politics of Dignity: How Status Inequality Shaped Redistributive Politics in India. Paper presented at the American Political Science Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, USA, September 12.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Johann Schulz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content published on the International Scientific and Current Research Conferences platform, including conference papers, abstracts, and presentations, is made available under an open-access model. Users are free to access, share, and distribute this content, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors and the source.