KEY ELEMENTS OF A DIGITAL URBANIZATION STRATEGY FOR TURKEY: INSIGHTS FROM PSYCHOMETRIC TESTING
Abstract
Background: Urbanization in Turkey has rapidly accelerated in recent decades, necessitating the adoption of digital technologies to foster sustainable, efficient, and inclusive cities. The concept of digital urbanization, which integrates Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), smart city frameworks, and digital governance, is vital for addressing contemporary urban challenges. However, the successful implementation of digital urbanization strategies requires understanding the attitudes and perceptions of citizens, which can be measured through psychometric testing.
Objective: This study aims to identify the key elements for developing a digital urbanization strategy for Turkey by utilizing psychometric testing to measure the public's attitudes, trust, concerns, and willingness to engage with digital urbanization initiatives.
Methods: A quantitative psychometric approach was used to survey 1,500 participants from various regions of Turkey, ensuring a diverse demographic sample that included urban, suburban, and rural populations. The survey consisted of 40 questions divided into four sections: awareness of digital urbanization, trust in digital infrastructure, perceived benefits and concerns, and willingness to participate in digital urbanization. Data were analyzed using factor analysis to identify underlying factors and regression analysis to determine significant predictors of support for digital urbanization.
Results: The study found that while 60% of respondents were familiar with the concept of digital urbanization, there was a notable lack of detailed knowledge regarding specific technologies. Trust in digital infrastructure was relatively low, with 45% of respondents expressing concerns about security and privacy. Despite these concerns, a majority (72%) recognized the potential benefits of digital urbanization, such as improved public services and traffic management. However, 52% were worried about job displacement due to automation, and 47% expressed concerns about the exclusion of marginalized groups. Approximately 65% of participants were open to engaging in digital governance and providing feedback on urban development projects.
Discussion: The findings highlight several critical factors for developing a successful digital urbanization strategy in Turkey. These include increasing digital literacy, ensuring data security and privacy, bridging the digital divide between urban and rural areas, and fostering greater citizen participation in digital governance. Public trust can be enhanced by implementing transparent policies on data use and ensuring inclusivity in the provision of digital infrastructure.
Conclusion: Digital urbanization in Turkey offers significant opportunities for improving urban living, but its success will depend on addressing public concerns related to privacy, security, and inclusivity. The results from psychometric testing provide valuable insights that can guide the development of a comprehensive, citizen-centered digital urbanization strategy, fostering sustainable and inclusive cities for the future.
Keywords
Digital urbanization, Turkey, psychometric testingHow to Cite
References
Andrushchenko, Victor, Irina Yershova-Babenko, Dina Kozobrodova, Anna Seliverstova, and Irina Lysakova. 2022. Digitalization of society: Implications and perspectives in the context of the psycho-dimensionality of social reality/psychosynertics. Amazonia Investiga 11: 183–95.
Angelidou, Margarita. 2014. Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities 41: 3–11.
Ash, James, Rob Kitchin, and Agnieszka Leszczynski. 2018. Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography 42: 25–43.
Azzari, Margherita, Chiara Garau, Paolo Nesi, Michela Paolucci, and Paola Zamperlin. 2018. Smart city governance strategies to better move towards a smart urbanism. In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2018: 18th International Conference, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, July 2–5. Proceedings, Part III 18. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 639–53.
Barns, Sarah. 2018. Platform urbanism rejoinder: Why now? What now. Mediapolis. A Journal of Cities and Culture 3.
Chiappini, Letizia. 2020. The urban digital platform: Instances from Milan and Amsterdam. Urban Planning 5: 277–88.
Coletta, Claudio, Liam Heaphy, Sung Yueh Perng, and Laurie Waller. 2017. Data-driven cities? Digital urbanism and its proxies: Introduction. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 8: 5–18.
Corbet, Heidi, Ian Caldwell, Ian Goodfellow, Michael Riebel, and Oliver Milton. 2019. Changing Spaces. In Future Campus. London: RIBA Publishing, pp. 29–37.
Cripps, Barry. 2017. Psychometric Testing: Critical Perspective. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
ÇŞİDB. 2024. Türkiye National Smart Cities Strategy and Action Plan. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change.
Cureton, Paul. 2022. Augmented Reality: Robotics, Urbanism and the Digital Turn. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Future. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Datta, Ayona. 2018. The digital turn in postcolonial urbanism: Smart citizenship in the making of India’s 100 smart cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 43: 405–19.
Datta, Ayona. 2023. The digitalising state: Governing digitalization-as-urbanization in the global south. Progress in Human Geography 47: 141–59.
De Hoop, Evelien, Timothy Moss, Adrian Smith, and Emanuel Löffler. 2021. Knowing and governing smart cities: Four cases of citizen engagement with digital urbanism. Urban Governance 1: 61–71.
De Vos, Jan. 2020. The Digitalization of (Inter) Subjectivity: A Psy-Critique of the Digital Death Drive. London: Routledge.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zeynep Demirci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content published on the International Scientific and Current Research Conferences platform, including conference papers, abstracts, and presentations, is made available under an open-access model. Users are free to access, share, and distribute this content, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors and the source.
