A DECADE OF IDENTITY STUDIES: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GLOBAL TRENDS AND SCHOLARLY IMPACT
Abstract
Introduction:
Identity studies, as an interdisciplinary field, have evolved rapidly over the past decade, addressing a broad range of social, political, and cultural issues related to the construction and negotiation of identity. This article provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research output in the field of identity studies from 2010 to 2020. The analysis explores global trends, major themes, and the scholarly impact of publications, offering insights into how the field has developed and identifying key areas of focus within academic research.
Methods:
A bibliometric methodology was employed to analyze over 3,000 academic publications related to identity studies, retrieved from databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The data were processed using bibliometric tools to examine publication trends, citation patterns, and the geographical distribution of research output. Additionally, keyword analysis and co-citation mapping were used to identify the central themes, influential authors, and emerging research directions within identity studies.
Results:
The results indicate significant growth in the volume of publications on identity studies over the past decade, with notable peaks in research output occurring in response to global social movements and political changes. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia were identified as the leading countries in terms of research productivity. Major themes emerging in the field include intersectionality, gender and sexual identities, postcolonial identity, racial and ethnic identity, and digital identities. A significant increase in interdisciplinary research involving psychology, sociology, political science, and cultural studies was also observed.
Discussion:
The analysis highlights the increasing relevance of identity studies in contemporary academic discourse, driven by global political events such as the rise of populism, movements for racial justice, and debates surrounding migration and multiculturalism. The interdisciplinary nature of the field has led to a more complex understanding of identity, with scholars increasingly engaging with new technologies, digital platforms, and social media in the study of selfhood and collective belonging. However, the results also reveal gaps in research, particularly in non-Western perspectives and non-academic contributions to the discourse. Future research directions include the need for more inclusive frameworks that integrate diverse cultural, geographical, and political viewpoints.
Conclusion:
This bibliometric analysis demonstrates the robust growth and evolving nature of identity studies over the past decade. By mapping global trends and scholarly impact, it offers a clearer understanding of the current state of the field and the trajectories that academic research in identity studies may follow in the future. The findings underscore the importance of continuing to expand the scope of identity research to incorporate diverse global perspectives and address emerging issues in the study of identity.
Keywords
Identity studies, bibliometric analysis, global trendsHow to Cite
References
Acharya, Sukanta. 2007. Identity, Technological Communication and Education in the Age of Globalization. Taylor & Francis 11: 339–56.
Ahmad, Hira, Muhammad Ahtazaz Ahsan, and Adnan Noor Mian. 2022. Trends in Publishing Blockchain Surveys: A Bibliometric Perspective. Springer Science+Business Media 22: 511–23.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Aria, Massimo, and Corrado Cuccurullo. 2017. Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11: 959–75.
Baas, Jeroen, Kevin Boyack, and John P. A. Ioannidis. 2020. Updated Science-Wide Author Databases of Standardized Citation Indicators. PLoS Biology 18: e3000918.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1998. On Glocalization: Or Globalization for Some, Localization for Some Others. SAGE Publishing 54: 37–49.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2001. The Individualized Society. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2011. Questions of Cultural Identity. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., pp. 18–36.
Baym, Nancy K. 2015. Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Bhabha, Homi K. 2004. The Location of Culture. Hove: Psychology Press.
Brinson, Peter. 2006. Liberation Frequency: The Free Radio Movement and Alternative Strategies of Media Relations. Taylor & Francis 47: 543–68.
Brunton, James, and Finian Buckley. 2020. ‘You’Re Thrown in the Deep End’: Adult Learner Identity Formation in Higher Education. Routledge 46: 2696–709.
Butler, Judith. 2011. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
Calhoun, Craig, ed. 1994. Social Theory and the Politics of Identity, 1st ed. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Power of Identity, 1st ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abeni Chukwu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content published on the International Scientific and Current Research Conferences platform, including conference papers, abstracts, and presentations, is made available under an open-access model. Users are free to access, share, and distribute this content, provided that proper attribution is given to the original authors and the source.